This is an important piece of quantitative research in an area that deserves an entire team of doctoral students and more than one PhD thesis, alongside other policy-informing reports.
I encountered this just yesterday browsing to the Wikipedia entry for Poju Zabludowicz (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poju_Zabludowicz?wprov=sfla1). The article is laced right through with subtle and not-so-subtle derogatory or politicised framing and language. This section is merely the most overt and grotesque:
"In 2021, in light of Israel’s recent attacks on Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem as well as the continued expulsions of Palestinian people from Sheikh Jarrah in East Jerusalem, BDZ again called for a boycott of the Zabludowicz Art Trust in solidarity with Palestine.[68] In response, Anita and Poju Zabludowicz released a statement acknowledging "the innocent lives lost on both sides" but failed to respond to the accusations, or commit to adjusting for them.[68]"
Wikipedia has become a key instrument for the wholesale Palestinian, Islamist, anti-Western, antizionist and antisemitic rewriting of accepted factual history and the West's received cultural wisdom.
This is an important piece of quantitative research in an area that deserves an entire team of doctoral students and more than one PhD thesis, alongside other policy-informing reports.
I encountered this just yesterday browsing to the Wikipedia entry for Poju Zabludowicz (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poju_Zabludowicz?wprov=sfla1). The article is laced right through with subtle and not-so-subtle derogatory or politicised framing and language. This section is merely the most overt and grotesque:
"In 2021, in light of Israel’s recent attacks on Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem as well as the continued expulsions of Palestinian people from Sheikh Jarrah in East Jerusalem, BDZ again called for a boycott of the Zabludowicz Art Trust in solidarity with Palestine.[68] In response, Anita and Poju Zabludowicz released a statement acknowledging "the innocent lives lost on both sides" but failed to respond to the accusations, or commit to adjusting for them.[68]"
Wikipedia has become a key instrument for the wholesale Palestinian, Islamist, anti-Western, antizionist and antisemitic rewriting of accepted factual history and the West's received cultural wisdom.
Yes, Zionism is the quintessential example of what has penetrated all corners of Wikipedia. With few exceptions, for instance, caveats have been systematically added to biographies of nearly every dead white man for some indiscretion by the standards of today’s far left, real or imagined, with the purpose of undermining the individual’s actual contributions. This is 1984, through and through.
It seems that some editors, mostly on one side though not only, coordinated off-wiki, and Wikipedia sanctioned them for it. Your quantitative analysis seems sincere, but difficult to verify independently. The "coordinated" part is based on other people's work, which you do cite. I'm very much pro Israel, and inclined to believe your conclusion--but not based on this analysis.
This is an important piece of quantitative research in an area that deserves an entire team of doctoral students and more than one PhD thesis, alongside other policy-informing reports.
I encountered this just yesterday browsing to the Wikipedia entry for Poju Zabludowicz (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poju_Zabludowicz?wprov=sfla1). The article is laced right through with subtle and not-so-subtle derogatory or politicised framing and language. This section is merely the most overt and grotesque:
"In 2021, in light of Israel’s recent attacks on Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem as well as the continued expulsions of Palestinian people from Sheikh Jarrah in East Jerusalem, BDZ again called for a boycott of the Zabludowicz Art Trust in solidarity with Palestine.[68] In response, Anita and Poju Zabludowicz released a statement acknowledging "the innocent lives lost on both sides" but failed to respond to the accusations, or commit to adjusting for them.[68]"
Wikipedia has become a key instrument for the wholesale Palestinian, Islamist, anti-Western, antizionist and antisemitic rewriting of accepted factual history and the West's received cultural wisdom.
Thank you! Did you happen to see an article by one of the Wikipedia's cofounders that was just published?
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/op-eds/4638304/larry-sanger-wikipedia-co-founder-banned-anonymous-mob/
Yes, I've been following Larry in X, and saw the whole saga unfold in real time
This is an important piece of quantitative research in an area that deserves an entire team of doctoral students and more than one PhD thesis, alongside other policy-informing reports.
I encountered this just yesterday browsing to the Wikipedia entry for Poju Zabludowicz (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poju_Zabludowicz?wprov=sfla1). The article is laced right through with subtle and not-so-subtle derogatory or politicised framing and language. This section is merely the most overt and grotesque:
"In 2021, in light of Israel’s recent attacks on Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem as well as the continued expulsions of Palestinian people from Sheikh Jarrah in East Jerusalem, BDZ again called for a boycott of the Zabludowicz Art Trust in solidarity with Palestine.[68] In response, Anita and Poju Zabludowicz released a statement acknowledging "the innocent lives lost on both sides" but failed to respond to the accusations, or commit to adjusting for them.[68]"
Wikipedia has become a key instrument for the wholesale Palestinian, Islamist, anti-Western, antizionist and antisemitic rewriting of accepted factual history and the West's received cultural wisdom.
This is an important piece of quantitative research in an area that deserves an entire team of doctoral students and more than one PhD thesis, alongside other policy-informing reports.
I encountered this just yesterday browsing to the Wikipedia entry for Poju Zabludowicz (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poju_Zabludowicz?wprov=sfla1). The article is laced right through with subtle and not-so-subtle derogatory or politicised framing and language. This section is merely the most overt and grotesque:
"In 2021, in light of Israel’s recent attacks on Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem as well as the continued expulsions of Palestinian people from Sheikh Jarrah in East Jerusalem, BDZ again called for a boycott of the Zabludowicz Art Trust in solidarity with Palestine.[68] In response, Anita and Poju Zabludowicz released a statement acknowledging "the innocent lives lost on both sides" but failed to respond to the accusations, or commit to adjusting for them.[68]"
Wikipedia has become a key instrument for the wholesale Palestinian, Islamist, anti-Western, antizionist and antisemitic rewriting of accepted factual history and the West's received cultural wisdom.
Yes, Zionism is the quintessential example of what has penetrated all corners of Wikipedia. With few exceptions, for instance, caveats have been systematically added to biographies of nearly every dead white man for some indiscretion by the standards of today’s far left, real or imagined, with the purpose of undermining the individual’s actual contributions. This is 1984, through and through.
It seems that some editors, mostly on one side though not only, coordinated off-wiki, and Wikipedia sanctioned them for it. Your quantitative analysis seems sincere, but difficult to verify independently. The "coordinated" part is based on other people's work, which you do cite. I'm very much pro Israel, and inclined to believe your conclusion--but not based on this analysis.
This is an important piece of quantitative research in an area that deserves an entire team of doctoral students and more than one PhD thesis, alongside other policy-informing reports.
I encountered this just yesterday browsing to the Wikipedia entry for Poju Zabludowicz (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poju_Zabludowicz?wprov=sfla1). The article is laced right through with subtle and not-so-subtle derogatory or politicised framing and language. This section is merely the most overt and grotesque:
"In 2021, in light of Israel’s recent attacks on Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem as well as the continued expulsions of Palestinian people from Sheikh Jarrah in East Jerusalem, BDZ again called for a boycott of the Zabludowicz Art Trust in solidarity with Palestine.[68] In response, Anita and Poju Zabludowicz released a statement acknowledging "the innocent lives lost on both sides" but failed to respond to the accusations, or commit to adjusting for them.[68]"
Wikipedia has become a key instrument for the wholesale Palestinian, Islamist, anti-Western, antizionist and antisemitic rewriting of accepted factual history and the West's received cultural wisdom.